Accepting new engagements

INDEPENDENT ENGINEERING PARTNER

Move the product forward. Without the engineering bottleneck.

Bring a slow backend, a fragile integration, or a product milestone that is stuck. Naubly helps you identify the right next step—and, when there is a fit, deliver the engineering work.

For founders, product teams, and agencies that need experienced engineering for a contained fix, a defined build, or ongoing support.

NAUBLY / FIELD NOTES
ENGINEERING WITH INTENTBUILT FOR WHAT COMES NEXT

Engineering experience includes systems involving

Financial modeling platformsMarketplace infrastructureBackend API platformsDeveloper toolingAutomation infrastructureHigh-performance WordPress engineering
01 / THE FRICTIONPROBLEMS WE SOLVE

When engineering problems block product growth.

Software platforms often reach a stage where early technical decisions begin limiting product evolution. Naubly typically works with teams facing challenges such as:

01

Architecture that cannot scale

Early system decisions begin creating technical debt that blocks new features and increases maintenance cost.

02

Backend platforms becoming slow or unreliable

APIs degrade under load, infrastructure becomes unpredictable, and reliability issues start affecting users.

03

Engineering velocity dropping

Teams spend more time working around infrastructure problems than shipping product features.

04

Complex integrations creating fragile systems

Payment providers, analytics platforms, and third-party APIs must operate reliably together under real conditions.

05

MVP platforms needing production-grade architecture

Systems built quickly must evolve into stable, maintainable platforms that internal teams can extend.

02 / THE METHODENGINEERING PRINCIPLES

How Naubly approaches engineering systems.

Reliable software platforms require disciplined engineering practices.

DESIGN THE RELATIONSHIPS.
ENGINEER THE WHOLE.
01

Architecture before implementation

Systems are designed before development begins to avoid costly refactoring later.

02

Clear system boundaries

Services, APIs, and data models are defined with explicit contracts between components.

03

Performance as a design constraint

Performance considerations are incorporated early in system design, not bolted on after the fact.

04

Maintainable systems

Codebases are structured so internal teams can extend and maintain them long after delivery.

03 / THE WORKENGINEERING CAPABILITIES

The right engineering help for the problem in front of you.

Focused support for teams that need better foundations, more reliable systems, or experienced delivery capacity.

Indicative starting points in USD. Final scope, deliverables, and responsibilities are agreed before work begins.

02

Backend Reliability & Remediation

From US$400 for narrowly bounded tasks

Investigate and resolve a defined bottleneck, failure mode, or operational gap in an existing application.

BEST SUITED TO

Teams that need evidence-led remediation without treating a narrowly scoped task as a full platform engagement.

  • Performance or failure-mode investigation
  • Critical-path fixes and targeted tests
  • Concise findings and implementation handoff
WHY IT MATTERS

Start with a contained problem, improve what matters most, and leave the system easier to operate with confidence.

Start a conversation
03

Product & Platform Engineering

Starting at US$4,000

Build or modernize the software foundations and product capabilities needed for the next stage of growth.

BEST SUITED TO

Product teams extending a platform, replacing fragile foundations, or delivering a larger feature with defined scope.

  • Backend APIs and application architecture
  • Database and data-model design
  • Implementation, testing, and maintainable delivery
WHY IT MATTERS

Clear boundaries and reliable foundations make future product work easier to ship and safer to change.

Start a conversation
ONGOING PARTNERSHIP

Naubly Ongoing
Engineering Partnership

US$1,000 per month

A flexible engineering relationship for businesses with a recurring stream of smaller maintenance, integration, and improvement priorities.

Ask if the partnership fits
WHAT IS INCLUDED
  • Up to 8 engineering hours per month for implementation, investigation, testing, and directly related work.
  • Monthly prioritization around the highest-value eligible work.
  • Acknowledgment of requests within two business days.
  • Lightweight updates on completed work, risks, and next steps where useful.
BOUNDARIES THAT PROTECT DELIVERY
  • Unused capacity does not roll over, and work beyond eight hours needs explicit agreement.
  • No 24/7 coverage, emergency on-call service, or guaranteed incident resolution.
  • Major features, migrations, and larger integrations are separately scoped.
  • Third-party costs and access-dependent work remain outside the monthly fee.

Choose a fixed-scope project when the outcome is defined. Choose the partnership when priorities recur month to month and continuity is more useful than a single delivery plan. The engagement is subject to scope, capacity, feasibility, access, and agreed priorities.

04 / PROOF IN PRACTICESELECTED WORK

Evidence of engineering work that holds up under real constraints.

A few documented examples across critical integrations, performance, and reusable product tooling.

01
DOCUMENTED EXPERIENCE · CRITICAL INTEGRATIONS

Payment migration under deadline

Planning a payment migration without losing sight of continuity

CONTEXT

A payment integration had to change while active billing cycles continued and subscriber continuity could not be treated as an afterthought.

APPROACH AND RESULT

The documented experience centers on subscriber state, edge cases, and sequencing a processor change around the risk of service interruption. The public profile does not expose enough implementation detail to claim a complete client case study, so this example is presented as relevant engineering experience rather than a guaranteed outcome.

WHY IT MATTERS

For teams changing a critical integration, careful sequencing and correctness matter as much as implementation speed.

View supporting profile
02
INDEPENDENT ENGINEERING PROJECT · PROTOCOL AND RUNTIME

Signal

Engineering backend correctness

CONTEXT

Signal is a reusable decision-processing platform for events, evidence, assessment, decisions, learning, memory, replay, and audit.

APPROACH AND RESULT

The public repository documents protocol-governed operation contracts, runtime dispatch, idempotency and replay metadata, subscriber dedupe, audit evidence, and a runnable reference proof. The case study distinguishes documented behavior from guarantees that require deeper inspection.

WHY IT MATTERS

For teams operating critical state changes, explicit contracts and inspectable evidence create a stronger starting point for correctness discussions.

Explore the Signal repository
03
OPEN SOURCE · REUSABLE ENGINEERING

Reusable conversion tooling

HTML to editable Gutenberg blocks

CONTEXT

WordPress workflows often involve repetitive conversion work that is difficult to reuse and easy to get wrong by hand.

APPROACH AND RESULT

html-to-gutenberg converts arbitrary HTML into fully editable WordPress Gutenberg blocks and provides a preview of the result. The public package also supports modern output workflows and test coverage.

WHY IT MATTERS

Reusable tooling can remove repetitive work from a delivery process and give teams a more dependable path from source content to editable output.

View repository
06 / COLLABORATIONHOW COLLABORATION WORKS

A focused path from uncertainty to working software.

Clear steps. Shared context. Working outcomes.

01

Align on the objective

Clarify the product goal, constraints, current system, and what a useful outcome looks like.

02

Define the approach

Choose the smallest sound path forward, with clear boundaries, trade-offs, and milestones.

03

Engineer and validate

Build the work, test critical paths, and keep progress visible as decisions become implementation.

04

Deliver and iterate

Ship working software, document what matters, and continue improving where the product needs it.

Accepting new engagements

08 / START A CONVERSATION

Have a project in mind? Let's find the next step.

Tell me what you are building, what is getting in the way, and what needs to happen next. I will review the context and respond with any questions and a practical next step if there is a fit. No commitment is needed to start the conversation.

01
Share the context

What you are building, what is blocked, and why it matters now.

02
Review the fit

We clarify the constraint, scope, and whether Naubly is the right partner.

03
Agree on a next step

If there is a fit, you get a practical path forward—without committing upfront.

A few sentences are enough. No deck or detailed specification required.

Your details are used only to review and respond to this enquiry.