Architecture that cannot scale
Early system decisions begin creating technical debt that blocks new features and increases maintenance cost.
INDEPENDENT ENGINEERING PARTNER
Bring a slow backend, a fragile integration, or a product milestone that is stuck. Naubly helps you identify the right next step—and, when there is a fit, deliver the engineering work.
For founders, product teams, and agencies that need experienced engineering for a contained fix, a defined build, or ongoing support.
Engineering experience includes systems involving
Software platforms often reach a stage where early technical decisions begin limiting product evolution. Naubly typically works with teams facing challenges such as:
Early system decisions begin creating technical debt that blocks new features and increases maintenance cost.
APIs degrade under load, infrastructure becomes unpredictable, and reliability issues start affecting users.
Teams spend more time working around infrastructure problems than shipping product features.
Payment providers, analytics platforms, and third-party APIs must operate reliably together under real conditions.
Systems built quickly must evolve into stable, maintainable platforms that internal teams can extend.
Reliable software platforms require disciplined engineering practices.
Systems are designed before development begins to avoid costly refactoring later.
Services, APIs, and data models are defined with explicit contracts between components.
Performance considerations are incorporated early in system design, not bolted on after the fact.
Codebases are structured so internal teams can extend and maintain them long after delivery.
Focused support for teams that need better foundations, more reliable systems, or experienced delivery capacity.
Indicative starting points in USD. Final scope, deliverables, and responsibilities are agreed before work begins.
Starting at US$2,500
Connect systems, automate business processes, and build dependable workflows with clear implementation scope.
Founders and product teams replacing manual handoffs, integrating external APIs, or orchestrating critical business workflows.
Reliable workflows reduce operational friction while giving your team a clearer path from business need to working software.
From US$400 for narrowly bounded tasks
Investigate and resolve a defined bottleneck, failure mode, or operational gap in an existing application.
Teams that need evidence-led remediation without treating a narrowly scoped task as a full platform engagement.
Start with a contained problem, improve what matters most, and leave the system easier to operate with confidence.
Starting at US$4,000
Build or modernize the software foundations and product capabilities needed for the next stage of growth.
Product teams extending a platform, replacing fragile foundations, or delivering a larger feature with defined scope.
Clear boundaries and reliable foundations make future product work easier to ship and safer to change.
US$1,000 per month
A flexible engineering relationship for businesses with a recurring stream of smaller maintenance, integration, and improvement priorities.
Ask if the partnership fitsChoose a fixed-scope project when the outcome is defined. Choose the partnership when priorities recur month to month and continuity is more useful than a single delivery plan. The engagement is subject to scope, capacity, feasibility, access, and agreed priorities.
A few documented examples across critical integrations, performance, and reusable product tooling.
A payment integration had to change while active billing cycles continued and subscriber continuity could not be treated as an afterthought.
The documented experience centers on subscriber state, edge cases, and sequencing a processor change around the risk of service interruption. The public profile does not expose enough implementation detail to claim a complete client case study, so this example is presented as relevant engineering experience rather than a guaranteed outcome.
For teams changing a critical integration, careful sequencing and correctness matter as much as implementation speed.
Signal is a reusable decision-processing platform for events, evidence, assessment, decisions, learning, memory, replay, and audit.
The public repository documents protocol-governed operation contracts, runtime dispatch, idempotency and replay metadata, subscriber dedupe, audit evidence, and a runnable reference proof. The case study distinguishes documented behavior from guarantees that require deeper inspection.
For teams operating critical state changes, explicit contracts and inspectable evidence create a stronger starting point for correctness discussions.
WordPress workflows often involve repetitive conversion work that is difficult to reuse and easy to get wrong by hand.
html-to-gutenberg converts arbitrary HTML into fully editable WordPress Gutenberg blocks and provides a preview of the result. The public package also supports modern output workflows and test coverage.
Reusable tooling can remove repetitive work from a delivery process and give teams a more dependable path from source content to editable output.
These endorsements describe Diogo's individual professional work. They are not presented as reviews commissioned by or written about Naubly as a company.
“He worked until all hours of the night getting a mission-critical project finished and anticipated possible challenges. I'm ready to hire him for my next project.”
“Diogo is very efficient. He listened patiently to all my needs and helped me accomplish exactly what I wanted. He always replied within an hour.”
“Fast and super easy to work with. Work was completed to a high standard.”
Clear steps. Shared context. Working outcomes.
Clarify the product goal, constraints, current system, and what a useful outcome looks like.
Choose the smallest sound path forward, with clear boundaries, trade-offs, and milestones.
Build the work, test critical paths, and keep progress visible as decisions become implementation.
Ship working software, document what matters, and continue improving where the product needs it.
Choose a fixed-scope project when the outcome and deliverables are clear. Choose the ongoing partnership when smaller engineering priorities recur month to month. If the work exceeds the monthly capacity or needs a dedicated delivery plan, Naubly can scope it separately—without implying that the partnership includes a larger project.
Start a conversation08 / START A CONVERSATION
Tell me what you are building, what is getting in the way, and what needs to happen next. I will review the context and respond with any questions and a practical next step if there is a fit. No commitment is needed to start the conversation.
What you are building, what is blocked, and why it matters now.
We clarify the constraint, scope, and whether Naubly is the right partner.
If there is a fit, you get a practical path forward—without committing upfront.
A few sentences are enough. No deck or detailed specification required.